Timesheets fail when logging is tedious and nobody reviews the result. duduHR keeps entry to a weekly grid against the projects people are actually assigned to, then puts a real review step behind it so the numbers are worth reporting on.
Projects carry their own members, so people log against the work they are genuinely on rather than picking from a company-wide list. Within a project, effort is recorded per task, which is what turns a total into something you can act on.
Timesheets are organised by week with an explicit status: drafted, submitted, then reviewed. Reviewers can attach a note, and the acknowledgement step closes the loop with the employee so corrections are a conversation rather than a silent edit.
Because entries are tied to projects, tasks and an approving manager, effort data holds up when it is used for client billing, capacity planning or a delivery post-mortem — the three moments when unreviewed timesheets fall apart.
Timesheets sit beside attendance, leave and payroll in the same branded workspace. People already sign in daily to clock in; logging the week does not mean adopting a separate tool.
Yes. Effort is logged per project and per task within it, with project membership controlling who can log where.
Timesheets move through submission and manager review, with reviewer notes and an employee acknowledgement step, so approval is part of the cycle rather than optional housekeeping.
Attendance answers whether and when someone worked; timesheets answer what they worked on. Both live in duduHR, which is why the two can be compared instead of drifting apart.
Clock-in/out with geofencing, shift rosters and automatic on-time / late / early tagging.
Reviews, reporting hierarchies, skip-level and dotted-line manager relationships.
Salary structures, payroll runs, payslips, Form-16, loss-of-pay and leave encashment — generated in a click.
We’ll set up your branded workspace at your-company.duduhr.com and walk your team through it.
Talk to us